Ignition Interlock FAQ's


Ignition Interlock Frequently Asked Questions

Does MADD advocate for ignition interlocks in all cars?
How reliable are ignition interlocks?
Who pays for the device?
How much do the devices cost? What if the offender can't afford it?
Are there ways to bypass the device, like having someone else blow into it?
What if someone else drives the vehicle with the interlock and fails a test?
Couldn’t someone just use compressed air to blow into the device?
Don’t offenders go back to their old behavior after the device is removed?
Could an interlock stop a person’s car in traffic, making a more dangerous hazard?
Is it dangerous to provide a running retest?
Are ignition interlocks constitutional?
Aren’t interlocks an inconvenience to family members who share the offender’s vehicle?
What if someone’s health inhibits them from providing a sufficient breath sample?
Won’t offenders just re-title their cars or sell them to avoid having to install an interlock?
Why are judges reluctant to utilize interlock sanctions even when they are mandatory?
Should drivers with high BACs be treated differently than drivers with lower illegal BACs?
What is the public’s attitudes towards requiring ignition interlocks for all convicted drunk drivers?

Does MADD advocate for ignition interlocks in all cars?

No. MADD advocates requiring ignition interlocks only for convicted drunk drivers with an illegal blood alcohol concentration of .08 or greater.

Return to Top

How reliable are ignition interlocks?

Alcohol ignition interlocks are required to meet standards set by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).  These standards ensure that the devices are reliable.

Return to Top

Who pays for the device?

Offenders pay for the interlocks, as they are the ones getting the benefit from it (the ability to drive legally).

Return to Top

How much do the devices cost?  What if the offender can't afford it?

On average, interlocks are about $70-150 to install and about $60-80 per month for monitoring and calibration. This is less than three dollars a day. In most states, interlock companies provide interlock devices for offenders who can't afford the devices or an indigent fund is set up by the state to cover costs for these offenders.

Return to Top

Are there ways to bypass the device, like having someone else blow into it?

This is possible, and there should be strict penalties for blowing into someone else’s ignition interlock or for having someone else blow into the device. However, interlocks are required to have anti-circumvention features that prevent such activity. One of these features is the running retest, which requires offenders to blow into the device at random intervals once the vehicle has been allowed to start. Furthermore, blowing into an interlock is a learned skill that requires specific training that would most likely be difficult for an impaired person to administer. There are also tamper-proof seals on interlocks.  You can learn more about how interlocks work here.

Return to Top

What if someone else drives the vehicle with the interlock and fails a retest?

This is possible. However, when someone commits a crime, he/she is responsible for the consequences of his/her actions. If an interlock is one of these consequences, then the offender is responsible for making sure those driving his/her vehicle do not drive intoxicated. State laws should also have provisions for an appeals process in which offenders can appeal failed tests.

Return to Top

Couldn’t someone just use compressed air to blow into the device?

No, the devices have temperature and air gauges to make sure this cannot occur.

Return to Top

Don’t offenders go back to their old behavior after the device is removed?

Studies have shown that interlock devices decrease recidivism by about two-thirds while installed on the vehicle. When removed, these rates tend to go back to normal. This might not be the case if interlock programs were coupled with treatment and offenders were not allowed to have the device removed until they demonstrated a period of compliance. The possibility of reoffending is much greater if tests are failed during the interlock period. Unfortunately in most states, offenders still automatically get the device removed at the end of the specified period, even if they failed a test the day before. To make laws more effective, states should add provisions for treatment and extended periods for non-compliance.

Return to Top

Could an interlock stop a person’s car in traffic, making a more dangerous hazard?

Interlocks are hooked up to a vehicle’s starter system, not to the engine itself. The interlock does not have the ability to stop the vehicle once it is running for safety reasons. When a driver fails a running retest, the vehicle’s horn will honk and/or the lights will flash to alert law enforcement – the vehicle will not stop.

Return to Top

Is it dangerous to provide a running retest?

The tests are not designed to be done while the car is actually rolling. Interlocks give people a few minutes – enough time to pull over – to perform the retest.

Return to Top

Are ignition interlocks constitutional?

Courts throughout the states have analyzed this issue and no state appellate court has overturned an interlock statute.

Return to Top

Aren’t interlocks an inconvenience to family members who share the offender’s vehicle?

No, they can drive the vehicle as well; they simply must blow into the device and prove sobriety before the car will start. Having an interlock installed on an offender’s vehicle actually allows the offender and his or her family to continue to drive legally. Other sanctions like vehicle impoundment or immobilization do not allow for this.

Return to Top

What if someone’s health inhibits them from providing a sufficient breath sample?

Individuals with low lung capacities due to being ill, having asthma or pulmonary disorders are generally able to provide the needed breath sample. If they can demonstrate that they are unable, the device settings can be adjusted to account for this. Failing that, medical waivers are needed.

Return to Top

Won’t offenders just re-title their cars or sell them to avoid having to install an interlock?

They can and do.  It is imperative that state laws plan for this by requiring that all cars that the offender operates, not just owns, are equipped with an interlock. Also, offenders choosing not to drive should be required to have some other form of electronic monitoring, like continuous alcohol-sensing ankle bracelets. In Hancock County, Indiana, alcohol ignition interlock installation rates increased from 20 percent to 62 percent when the alternative was electronic monitoring.  These policies alone reduced DWI/DUI rates by 40 percent for first offenders and 22 percent for repeat offenders. 1 

Return to Top

Why are judges reluctant to utilize interlock sanctions even when they are mandatory?

Some judges do not know how they work or do not understand their effectiveness. Judicial education on this topic is so important because generally those judges who know the most about interlocks are the ones using them most.

Return to Top

Should drivers with high BACs be treated differently than drivers with lower illegal BACs?

Why?  The illegal drunk driving limit in all 50 states and Washington, D.C. is .08 BAC. Studies show that offenders with extremely high-BACs are only slightly more likely than offenders just over the legal limit to recommit the crime of drunk driving.

Return to Top

What is the public’s attitudes towards requiring ignition interlocks for all convicted drunk drivers?

Public support for interlocks ranges from 69 percent to 88 percent. 2,3,4,5

Return to Top

Citation


1. Voas, Robert et al. “Motivating DUI Offenders to Install Interlocks: Avoiding Jail as an Incentive.” Accident Analysis and Prevention 25 (2001): 102A

2. 69 percent. CDC “"Attitudes towards requiring ignition interlocks for all driving while intoxicated offenders: findings from the 2010 HealthStyles Survey" July, 2012. http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/early/2012/07/05/injuryprev-2012-040367.abstract

3. 76 percent: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. “2011 Traffic Safety Index.” January 2012. http://www.aaafoundation.org/pdf/2011TSCIndex.pdf

4. 84 percent: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. “Public is Ready to Lock out Driving over the Legal Limit.” Status Report, September 17, 2009. http://www.iihs.org/externaldata/srdata/docs/sr4408.pdf

5. 88 percent: Center for Excellent in Rural Safety. “CERS Survey.” Rural Safety News. June 2010. http://www.ruralsafety.umn.edu/publications/ruralsafetynews/2010/02/